The Sad Saga of South Carolina State University

scsu copyLast month, a legislative subcommittee in South Carolina voted to close South Carolina State University for two years. While this proposal is now off the table, the fate of the university and its leadership is still up in the air. Here are the latest developments:

A circuit court judge ordered the board of trustees of South Carolina State University not to fire suspended university president Thomas Elzey. The judge noted that the legislature was currently considering firing all of the trustees. So the judge ruled that whoever the legislature designated as the new governing board should decide Dr. Elzey’s fate.

The South Carolina Senate voted 41-1 to replace the board of trustees with a governing body appointed by lawmakers and Governor Nikki Haley. But the South Carolina House wants the authority to be invested in the state’s Budget and Control Board.

PresidentThomasElzeyIn another development, President Elzey filed a lawsuit against the university saying that the board did not honor his four-year contract. He seeks $400,000 that he would be owed if he was able to complete his tenure plus additional money for the humiliation and emotional stress he has endured.

The board of trustees has discussed reaching a financial settlement with Dr. Elzey.

Update: President Elzey was fired on March 16 after a court ruled that the board had the power to do so.


Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. James Roberts says:

    The board of trustees is behaving like the Republican Clown car and needs to be replaced. How many of them are sincerely interested in the well being of State, how many make financial contributions to the school, how many have access to financial resources? From what I understand, their only interest is free football tickets.

    A big change is needed.

  2. Michael says:

    The “sad saga of South Carolina State University” is that you have a cabal of “so-called degree holding” and “so-called Black group affiliated” individuals who are: 1) more concerned about their lofty title (e.g., Board of Regents Members); and 2) not so inclined to making decisions in the best interests of South Carolina State University. In fact, similar claims can be made against the entire Black community. Case in point, the Black community has more so-called Blacks with degree now as compared to a mere 40 years ago. Yet, our overall conditionality has not significantly improved. Something’s very wrong with this picture.

Leave a Reply

Due to incidents of abuse and harassment that have occurred in the past, JBHE will not publish telephone numbers or email addresses of individuals in this space. If you want to contact someone in a particular article, we suggest you contact them directly not in an open forum.